On the eve of Thanksgiving, attorney Sidney Powell who works closely with the Trump legal team, unleashed the Kraken, a 104-page bombshell lawsuit in Georgia targeting the massive voter fraud that has occurred there to steal the election for Joe Biden.
The allegations listed in the document include many irregularities, incidences of ballot stuffing, violations of the electoral code of Georgia, the use of voting machines to change votes, and unlawful auditing processes.
“The Kraken came down to Georgia on this Thanksgiving Eve in the form of a 104 pg BOMBSHELL complaint exposing the massive fraud that overwhelmed the 2020 Georgia Elections. Georgia, you are most certainly on our minds. Link to filing to come, stay tuned!” attorney Abigail Frye said.
The Kraken came down to Georgia on this Thanksgiving Eve in the form of a 104 pg BOMBSHELL complaint exposing the massive fraud that overwhelmed the 2020 Georgia Elections. Georgia, you are most certainly on our minds. Link to filing to come, stay tuned! @SidneyPowell1 @LLinWood
— Abigail Frye ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@abigailcfrye) November 26, 2020
Many witnesses have come forward and presented evidence of voting fraud that they have observed, some reported seeing ballots cast for President Trump transferred to Joe Biden’s piles, and “pristine” votes that had been pre-printed were 100% for Biden, reported The Gateway Pundit.
One witness testified they had observed “counterfeit” ballots with a darker watermark, and 100% were for Biden. The elections director was informed of the counterfeit ballots; however, they dismissed any concerns and gave the excuse because different printers had been used, making some watermarks darker.
On page 35 of Sidney Powell’s filing, the witness’s testimony refers to “the use of different paper for ballots, that would constitute fraud” stating, “I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.”
Another witness, Susan Voyles, who also gave a sworn statement in Wood v. Raffensperger said she had observed piles of new ballots that had different textured papers, with machine-stamped bubbles, and noticed only two votes for Trump; all the rest went for Biden.
“Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a difference in the texture of the paper—it was if they were intended for absentee use but had not been used for that purpose. There was a difference in the feel. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they had come from or where they had been processed. These stood out,” said her affidavit.
“In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump,” she continued.