Correction: The original article implied that the 500 signatories were all scientists or experts in the field of climate science when if fact, they are experts in various fields. The BL regrets this error.

An appeal was made by hundreds of experts in various fields to world leaders in a signed declaration to the United Nations Climate Action Summit in New York on Sept. 23. These experts implored leaders at the summit to study the facts on climate change before resorting to drastic and hugely expensive measures on climate action.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation,” wrote the signatories.

More and more experts accuse climate change advocates of being extremists and alarmists. (Shutterstock.com).

Scientific studies and opinions need to be respected, as the notion that climate change is the fault of humans is creating hysteria among young people. It is considered by many to be a leftist push to affect change in the next generation. 

Many intelligent people are active in their criticism of present climate-change models. “Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” the signatories propose.

“Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.

We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” said the signatories.

“We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.” The statement continued, “If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times and throughout the world.” Climate activists are scaring our children into believing humans are the cause of climate change, and their futures will become almost nonexistent. Voters of the future may become eager to vote for authoritarians.”

See the attached press briefing and registered letter. The current list of signees can be found here.

Democratic presidential candidate entrepreneur Andrew Yang on Sept. 12, 2019, during a Democratic presidential primary debate hosted by ABC at Texas Southern University in Houston. (David J. Phillip/AP Photo)

“What we’re really selling is not the car, it’s mobility,” said Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang during MSNBC’s climate forum at Georgetown University on Sept 19. “So if you have mobility that’s then tied into a much more, if you had like, for example, this constant roving fleet of electric cars that you would just order up, then you could diminish the impact of ground transportation on our environment very, very quickly,” he said.    

Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, 16, appeared on the world stage at the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York and accused world leaders of robbing her of her future. Her face distorted with passion, she read a script that was loaded with anger toward world leaders, blaming them for destroying her future.

“How dare you,” she lashed out. “People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing.” Accompanying Thunberg everywhere she is giving speeches is Luisa-Marie Neubauer, a 23-year-old, far-left activist from Germany. She is the youth ambassador for an international lobbying and campaigning organization known as the “ONE Foundation,” which is funded by George Soros, Bill & Melinda Gates, and Bono, among other celebrity names, according to the One website.

Whatever happened to the innocence of youth? Is it fair to expose our children to the pressure of worrying if they have a future? Children should be free to pursue their hopes and dreams without the fear of world extinction.

President Trump chose to miss most of the U.N. Climate summit in favor of hosting a religious freedom summit to address the global problem of religious persecution. It was the first time any leader of a nation has addressed the U.N. on religious persecution.

Family Research Council (FRC) President Tony Perkins, who is also in charge of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom said, “I commend the president for taking on an issue that impacts people’s lives today, and the results can actually be measured. “

Finally, just for some historic and climate change perspective we reference an indisputable expert. During an interview by talk show host Stephen Crowder in May 2017 found on Youtube, Doctor of Ecology and cofounder of Greenpeace Patrick Moore said, “There’s no such thing as climate science in the sense that climate science is a whole array of different disciplines interacting.

You’ve got meteorology. You’ve got atmospheric chemistry and atmospheric physics. You’ve got astrophysics and the sun. You’ve got oceanography. You’ve got the whole terrestrial biosphere with all the forests and the crops and the soils, rocks and all the ice on the poles, and all of those things are interacting with each other in ways that we don’t understand perfectly but we’re gaining more and more insight into it as time goes on.”

Stephen Crowder said “Okay well I just want to clarify. You would be more of a scientist in this field than say someone with a bachelor’s in mechanical engineering?” Dr. Moore replied, “Yes, but I don’t discount the lay person even studying this thoroughly and having a good mind to analyze the information. You don’t have to be a PhD to understand the basics of the situation in particular to understand how uncertain, how much uncertainty there is in this subject rather than the whole science is settled dogma. That’s just intellectual laziness I suppose to just say the argument’s over.”

Mr. Crowder said, “In a nutshell, what is your position on the currently sort of mass accepted concept of man made climate change?” Dr. Moore replied, “Well Stephen first, there is actually no proof that we are causing the warming. There’s a number of reasons to say that. The evidence is actually against the hypothesis that we’re causing the warming. Because there’s been warming and cooling cycles all through the history of life and some of them are longer than others.”