Doctors could be stripped of their license to practice medicine, if they contradict or question the official narrative about experimental COVID-19 vaccines.
The U.S. Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) warned physicians not to spread “misinformation” about the COVID (Chinese Communist Party virus) vaccine in interviews, medical literature, recorded discussions, or social media posts.
Any doctor who fails to comply and sows “distrust” will be sanctioned and referred to their respective state medical board for disciplinary action. If the behavior continues their medical license could be suspended or revoked.
The following could constitute a breach: warning about the risks of experimental vaccines, making observations about adverse effects, and drawing conclusions based on knowledge and experience. It is also discouraged to discuss benefits of natural immunity, the need for informed consent to vaccinate, and those who mention alternative treatments–either preventive or palliative.
Participating in media interviews is also not recommended, unless the content promotes vaccines without questioning “science.”
“Licensed physicians possess a high degree of public trust and, therefore, have a powerful platform in society,” FSMB said in a statement. “They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients, and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health.”
BL understands informed consent is now considered to be “misinformation” about the CCP virus vaccine, because the basic medical principle could motivate a patient to refuse the jab. This has pressured clinicians to abandon their conscience and medical ethics.
This directive could also prevent doctors from discussing and analyzing data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The system, administered by both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, records hundreds of thousands of serious injuries and tens of thousands of deaths from the vaccines in question.
For instance Joseph Mercola confirmed he would remove 25 years of research from his Mercola website plus any new work within 48 hours due to the directive.
“We are now in a different time, a much darker time [and] the silence of free speech is now deafening,” Mercola said on the website. “Not only is blatant censorship tolerated, it is being encouraged by the very people who were to be entrusted with protecting our freedom of speech.”
“A dissenter of medical mandates is now a target and obstacle to be removed,” he added. “I know–that is 25 years’s worth of blood, sweat, and tears coming down.”